|
Post by chisox100 on Aug 15, 2008 12:30:23 GMT -5
Do you think there is a chance that they will add more NFL teams? The NFL is very popular and there are some big cities that dont have teams that could use some teams. Cities like: Los Angeles Anaheim Las Vegas Portland, Or San Antonio
it will add a lot of revenue to the NFL and they have the talent to be dispurst.
|
|
|
Post by Ziggy/Franzen Troll on Aug 15, 2008 16:49:56 GMT -5
Fort Myers Theifs FTW
|
|
|
Post by seaver41 on Aug 15, 2008 21:24:23 GMT -5
LA needs a team.
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Aug 16, 2008 7:30:53 GMT -5
no way, the setup is perfect...4 teams in each division, 6 playoff teams, none of that will change
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Aug 16, 2008 13:17:35 GMT -5
no way, the setup is perfect...4 teams in each division, 6 playoff teams, none of that will change Baseball has some divisions with 4 teams and one with 6 the NFL could deal with that too
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Aug 16, 2008 13:32:02 GMT -5
no way, the setup is perfect...4 teams in each division, 6 playoff teams, none of that will change Baseball has some divisions with 4 teams and one with 6 the NFL could deal with that too yea, but do you think baseball wants it that way?...it has to be that way b/c if there were 15 teams in each league, the schedule wouldnt work...baseball might add on 2 teams to the AL to even it out, who knows...
|
|
|
Post by Zack Attack Troll on Aug 16, 2008 15:17:45 GMT -5
It's fine. Don't need more teams right now.
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Aug 18, 2008 16:30:22 GMT -5
Baseball has some divisions with 4 teams and one with 6 the NFL could deal with that too yea, but do you think baseball wants it that way?...it has to be that way b/c if there were 15 teams in each league, the schedule wouldnt work...baseball might add on 2 teams to the AL to even it out, who knows... They would not add team they were thinking about getting rid of a team like the Twins (I wish they did) beside were would they put them Louisville, Salt Lake City, San Antionio, Jacksonville, Memphis.............not a lot of good choices How about names for some new NFL teams? Los Angeles Emos of Anaheim?
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Aug 18, 2008 17:00:20 GMT -5
yea, but do you think baseball wants it that way?...it has to be that way b/c if there were 15 teams in each league, the schedule wouldnt work...baseball might add on 2 teams to the AL to even it out, who knows... They would not add team they were thinking about getting rid of a team like the Twins (I wish they did) beside were would they put them Louisville, Salt Lake City, San Antionio, Jacksonville, Memphis.............not a lot of good choices How about names for some new NFL teams? Los Angeles Emos of Anaheim? dude, u really do say some stupid things
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Aug 18, 2008 18:24:00 GMT -5
They would not add team they were thinking about getting rid of a team like the Twins (I wish they did) beside were would they put them Louisville, Salt Lake City, San Antionio, Jacksonville, Memphis.............not a lot of good choices dude, u really do say some stupid things Im making a point there is no where to put another MLB team. There is not enough talent to be dispurts throughout 31 or 32 teams adding another team in some big enough cities would take away from other teams like adding an MLB team in Portland would hurt the Mariners. In San Antionio would hurt the Astros, Louisville would hurt the Reds, Jacksonville would hurt the Rays, Indianapolis would hurt the Indians and White Sox, Tucson would hurt the D'backs. New Orleans is not big enough anymore, Columbus is too close to Clevland and Cinci, San Jose would hurt the A's and Giants, Charlote is border-line and it would hurt the Braves finally Salt Lake City could hurt the Rockies. Those are the cities in the US that are in the top 40 biggest populations without a MLB team they all would hurt another MLB team, If you put Canada in the mix Vancouver hurts the Mariners, Ouebec City, French Canada fails at supporting a team, Hamilton is too close to Toronto, Calgary and Edmonton barley support a Hockey team so Canado cannot have another MLB team. Adding the Carabean, San Jose, Puerto Rico had it chance with the Expos and failed, Havannah is in communist Cuba and that would not work. Hispaniola is not populated enough, Mexico does not care about baseball, and lastly South America is too far away. So adding a team anywhere does not make a lot of sense if you want to find proof that the Twins were almost disbanned look it up some where, because it was a possibility back in 02-03. I dont think that there is anything else to say here.
|
|
|
Post by Ziggy/Franzen Troll on Aug 18, 2008 18:25:53 GMT -5
They would not add team they were thinking about getting rid of a team like the Twins (I wish they did) beside were would they put them Louisville, Salt Lake City, San Antionio, Jacksonville, Memphis.............not a lot of good choices How about names for some new NFL teams? Los Angeles Emos of Anaheim? dude, u really do say some stupid things your one to talk
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Aug 19, 2008 9:09:23 GMT -5
dude, u really do say some stupid things Im making a point there is no where to put another MLB team. There is not enough talent to be dispurts throughout 31 or 32 teams adding another team in some big enough cities would take away from other teams like adding an MLB team in Portland would hurt the Mariners. In San Antionio would hurt the Astros, Louisville would hurt the Reds, Jacksonville would hurt the Rays, Indianapolis would hurt the Indians and White Sox, Tucson would hurt the D'backs. New Orleans is not big enough anymore, Columbus is too close to Clevland and Cinci, San Jose would hurt the A's and Giants, Charlote is border-line and it would hurt the Braves finally Salt Lake City could hurt the Rockies. Those are the cities in the US that are in the top 40 biggest populations without a MLB team they all would hurt another MLB team, If you put Canada in the mix Vancouver hurts the Mariners, Ouebec City, French Canada fails at supporting a team, Hamilton is too close to Toronto, Calgary and Edmonton barley support a Hockey team so Canado cannot have another MLB team. Adding the Carabean, San Jose, Puerto Rico had it chance with the Expos and failed, Havannah is in communist Cuba and that would not work. Hispaniola is not populated enough, Mexico does not care about baseball, and lastly South America is too far away. So adding a team anywhere does not make a lot of sense if you want to find proof that the Twins were almost disbanned look it up some where, because it was a possibility back in 02-03. I dont think that there is anything else to say here. no, i'm saying you make things up...the twins were never gonna be disbanded b/c ONCE AGAIN, that would leave an odd number of teams in a league, which ONCE AGAIN, wouldnt work
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Aug 19, 2008 16:00:43 GMT -5
Im making a point there is no where to put another MLB team. There is not enough talent to be dispurts throughout 31 or 32 teams adding another team in some big enough cities would take away from other teams like adding an MLB team in Portland would hurt the Mariners. In San Antionio would hurt the Astros, Louisville would hurt the Reds, Jacksonville would hurt the Rays, Indianapolis would hurt the Indians and White Sox, Tucson would hurt the D'backs. New Orleans is not big enough anymore, Columbus is too close to Clevland and Cinci, San Jose would hurt the A's and Giants, Charlote is border-line and it would hurt the Braves finally Salt Lake City could hurt the Rockies. Those are the cities in the US that are in the top 40 biggest populations without a MLB team they all would hurt another MLB team, If you put Canada in the mix Vancouver hurts the Mariners, Ouebec City, French Canada fails at supporting a team, Hamilton is too close to Toronto, Calgary and Edmonton barley support a Hockey team so Canado cannot have another MLB team. Adding the Carabean, San Jose, Puerto Rico had it chance with the Expos and failed, Havannah is in communist Cuba and that would not work. Hispaniola is not populated enough, Mexico does not care about baseball, and lastly South America is too far away. So adding a team anywhere does not make a lot of sense if you want to find proof that the Twins were almost disbanned look it up some where, because it was a possibility back in 02-03. I dont think that there is anything else to say here. no, i'm saying you make things up...the twins were never gonna be disbanded b/c ONCE AGAIN, that would leave an odd number of teams in a league, which ONCE AGAIN, wouldnt work This is not made up its 100% either you dont know what your talking about or you were not a baseball fan then. Sox fans talk about it all the time how we wish the Twins were disbanned. It would not mess up the schedule it just means you add more series VS other division or move the Twins in general. This thread is over as far as Im concered im not going to check back here for one of your gay reply trying to salvage an argument lost.
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Aug 19, 2008 19:47:09 GMT -5
no, i'm saying you make things up...the twins were never gonna be disbanded b/c ONCE AGAIN, that would leave an odd number of teams in a league, which ONCE AGAIN, wouldnt work This is not made up its 100% either you dont know what your talking about or you were not a baseball fan then. Sox fans talk about it all the time how we wish the Twins were disbanned. It would not mess up the schedule it just means you add more series VS other division or move the Twins in general. This thread is over as far as Im concered im not going to check back here for one of your gay reply trying to salvage an argument lost. i lost?!...lmao...your saying that a schedule would work with 13 teams in a league..lol...lets try this... yankees vs. red sox orioles vs. blue jays rays vs. white sox indians vs. royals tigers vs. angels rangers vs. mariners A's vs......?? oh, thats right, usually 162 game schedules work just fine when teams get 3 straight days off...god damn, your so ignorant that you actually believe what your saying when it makes no sense whatsoever...lets change the ending here, YOU LOSE THE ARGUEMENT!!!
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Aug 19, 2008 23:10:33 GMT -5
This is not made up its 100% either you dont know what your talking about or you were not a baseball fan then. Sox fans talk about it all the time how we wish the Twins were disbanned. It would not mess up the schedule it just means you add more series VS other division or move the Twins in general. This thread is over as far as Im concered im not going to check back here for one of your gay reply trying to salvage an argument lost. i lost?!...lmao...your saying that a schedule would work with 13 teams in a league..lol...lets try this... yankees vs. red sox orioles vs. blue jays rays vs. white sox indians vs. royals tigers vs. angels rangers vs. mariners A's vs......?? oh, thats right, usually 162 game schedules work just fine when teams get 3 straight days off...god damn, your so ignorant that you actually believe what your saying when it makes no sense whatsoever...lets change the ending here, YOU LOSE THE ARGUEMENT!!! i171.photobucket.com/albums/u317/briggs93/pwnonclubhouse.jpgBefore you try to make an argument do a little research.
|
|