|
|
Post by surgeaholic on Apr 1, 2008 19:17:09 GMT -5
post comments here
|
|
|
|
Post by tarlow00 on Apr 2, 2008 20:48:24 GMT -5
absolutely not.
it is intentionally smaller than a giant cookie cutter metroplex stadium, so as to create more ideal sight lines for fans, more fan-friendly character elements like park at the park and the western metal seating in left. expanding would take the soul out of a beautiful new park
|
|
|
|
Post by seaver41 on Apr 2, 2008 22:48:54 GMT -5
42,445 is a good size for a ballpark. The only thing they should do to Petco Park is change the name.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marlins on Apr 3, 2008 13:54:27 GMT -5
I don't see why there needs to be a change to the ballpark...it's fine as is.
|
|
