|
|
Post by Fish Troll on Dec 17, 2008 0:23:46 GMT -5
The WBC suppose to be taken with pride. To get invited in must mean that you are good enough to join the tournament to represent your country to see which is the best in baseball. But if you join you will risk getting injury and fatigue and might not perform as well as if you didn't join. Do you prefer your players joining the WBC or stay home if they get invited?
|
|
|
|
Post by seaver41 on Dec 17, 2008 1:24:13 GMT -5
I don't want any of the players on the Mets going. Only crappy players should be allowed to play.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zack Attack Troll on Dec 17, 2008 15:44:08 GMT -5
Some players I wouldn't want to, some I wouldn't care. Relievers...fine. Jose Guillen...fine (it'd help him get into shape quicker).
I wouldn't want to see a SP go though. Luckily I don't think that's going to be a problem at least for this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Dec 18, 2008 15:48:28 GMT -5
I'm all for it. Players play in spring training games anyway..this is baseball, we shouldn't baby our players, especially with something as great as an idea as the World Baseball Classic.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeeswonseries on Dec 19, 2008 8:11:44 GMT -5
A lot of players play in other leagues every offseason, what's the big deal with them going to the WBC?
|
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Dec 19, 2008 20:30:31 GMT -5
Instead of having the WBC before spring training have it instead of ST for people who particpate
|
|
|
|
Post by chisox100 on Dec 20, 2008 14:38:10 GMT -5
The US team needs more pitcher. THey need CC Sabbathia and AJ Burnett to pitch 20 innings each in the WBC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fuck Mike Brown on Dec 20, 2008 16:35:54 GMT -5
so you suggest having the players a team needs most prepare for the season by not having them hit against MLB pitching and building teamwork and chemistry with their team but playing in an international event?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fish Troll on Dec 20, 2008 17:48:48 GMT -5
Spring Training is not MLB level.
|
|
