|
|
Post by seaver41 on Jan 30, 2007 19:06:58 GMT -5
Ugh, you're killing me with the basketball
I've read a bit about the game. It seemed quite impressive. Any team that can go on a streak like that definitely has some quality talent. Garnett's performance really seemed to show his value to his team. He definitely had the fire in his belly to win and inspired that amongst his team.
Phoenix probably could have won if they played better defensively. That's what I hate about basketball. The defense does next to nothing. It's just too boring when the teams are constantly going up and down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:08:00 GMT -5
nice, 3 points, seavers up.
Scoreboard:
Mike 12 brewersgm:13 Slugfest:10 seaver41:8
|
|
|
|
Post by seaver41 on Jan 30, 2007 19:09:35 GMT -5
Already posted^
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:13:10 GMT -5
2 points, again nice try for a non basketball fan
Mike and brewersgm in in the finals!!
Scoreboard:
Mike 12 brewersgm:13 Slugfest:7ELIMINATED! seaver41:10ELIMINATED!
mikes up with the first topic of round 2
|
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Jan 30, 2007 19:13:56 GMT -5
I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that neither of them will have a very good game. I say Peyton throws for 200 yards, a TD, and 2 picks. I say Grossman throws for 130 yards, a TD and 3 picks. With this being said, I think the quarterback that will succeed will be Grossman, and I say this because I think the Bears will come out victorious. As we all know about football, the quarterback gets all the glory and all the blame. With this being said, I wanna say that I feel bad for Peyton manning because, if the bears win, the newspaper headlines will read, “PEYTON LOSES THE BIG ONE”, no matter how good of a game he has. I don’t think that either QB will outshine the other.
|
|
|
|
Post by seaver41 on Jan 30, 2007 19:17:38 GMT -5
Next time can we have more baseball questions in the first round?
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:19:33 GMT -5
nice job, 4 points, brewersgm up
Mike 16 brewersgm:13
|
|
|
|
Post by brewersgm on Jan 30, 2007 19:27:15 GMT -5
Im gonna say that Peyton will win the mvp award. Peyton has the weapons on the offense sife of the ball and defense side of the ball. On the offense side Marvin Harrison is the main target although Rggie Wayne is one of the most underrated player in hte game. On the defense side you have a imporing defense of line and secertary. Although the Beras d is good Colts will prevail in superbowl 41 and Peyton Manning will throw 3 td's 1 to Wayne and 2 to Harrison. 24-17 final score.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:31:14 GMT -5
3 points, mikes up
Mike 16 brewersgm:16
|
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Jan 30, 2007 19:34:27 GMT -5
I don’t blame the Rockies for backing out of this deal. All the Rockies have left is Todd Helton, Matt Holliday and Jeff Francis. Helton has been a staple in the Rockies organization for many years now, playing for them since 1997 after being drafted by them in the 1st round (8th overall) in the ’95 draft. Helton’s stats have been steadily declining over the past couple years, but he hasn’t hit under .300 since his 1st year in the majors when he hit .280. Listen to these batting averages(in order of his career)... .315, .320, .372, .336, .329, .358, .347, .320, .302. Now, is that a guy that you wanna trade?
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:35:26 GMT -5
nice job, 4 points, brewersgm up
Mike:20 brewersgm:16
|
|
|
|
Post by brewersgm on Jan 30, 2007 19:38:41 GMT -5
The trade that would have sent Helton to Boston would have been a awful trade for COL. Without Helton you wouldn't have had any offense. The rumored trade was Lowell and Hansen I think, although if you were trying to cut salary in trading Helton, why would u take on Lowell's contract? You would have only saved about 8-10 mil.It would have been bad for BOS also because not only are you taking on Helton's salary your taking on a guy who sucks on the road. Helton hit .336 in Coors field away from Coors field he hit a awful .266. He had 51 rbi in Coors and only 30 rbi away from coors. His a .266 average good enough for a 18 mil contract? I dont think it is. I also think COL could have gotten a lot more for Helton than potentiolly Lowell and Hansen or Lester.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:40:26 GMT -5
4 points.. all tied at 20! mikes up.
|
|
|
|
Post by diehardmetsfan on Jan 30, 2007 19:41:40 GMT -5
I think that right now, this is a good decision for Curt. He threw 204 innings last year, went 15-7, started 31 games, had a 3.97 era and had 183 K’s, doing all of this in the very tough AL. If Schilling can stay healthy this year, and pitch like he did last year and come out and prove he is still a veteran force in the game of baseball, I think it’s a very good decision for Schilling. Boston also needs that veteran leader on there pitching staff and Schilling obviously brings that to the table. The Red Sox can have a very good staff, with Beckett and Matzsuzaka, but they will definitely need a veteran leader.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 30, 2007 19:44:48 GMT -5
4 points... brewersgm up!! come on u need a good response here!
|
|
